Sunday, September 14, 2008

Reading the web with a critical eye

ICQ web savvy reading

searching for information on google or "Cuil"? Read with a critical (informed and questioning) eye....


ICYouSee
Guide to Critical Thinking


Consider the following five suggestions when examining Web pages:




  1. Make sure you are in the right place.

    Why are you using the
    Web? Don't use the Web because it is fun and easy; use it when it is
    the appropriate source for the information you are seeking. An hour
    on the Web may not answer a question that you could find within two
    minutes of picking up a reference book. (This is not to say there
    aren't useful Web sources.)

    The Web may have been originally
    designed as a medium to exchange scientific (and military?) research
    data, but it has become a commercial playground. The research is
    still there, but it is harder to find, or no longer free, or not
    easily accessible, or inaccessible.



  2. When in doubt, doubt.

    Because almost anyone can put up almost
    anything on the Web, you must be especially careful as you examine
    each site. Accuracy is not always easy to detect, so you must test
    one source against another. Try to differentiate fact from opinion.
    Look for ambiguity and manipulative reasoning and bias. Examine
    assumptions, including and perhaps especially, your own.

    Who
    coined the phrase "Question authority!"? Two different Web
    sites provide two different answers. One site, which has since
    disappeared with no forwarding address, attributed the quote to Tim
    Leary [sic]. Tofa's Quote Collection attributes it to J. Baldwen
    [sic]. My advice: question the authority of both these sources.



  3. Consider the source.

    Who are the authors of the Web page? What
    gives them their expertise? By what authority do they write? Have
    the authors indicated their research methods or provided any
    supportive evidence for their conclusions? Have they provided you a
    means to contact them? Check the URL to see if the domain name
    includes;

    .com (commercial),
    .gov
    (governmental),
    .org (non-profit organization ),
    .net
    (network),
    .edu (educational),
    or a two letter code
    (country of origin)

    It will give you a good clue about the
    Web page's author or source. You can't judge a Web site just by its
    code, however. Not all commercial sites will try to sell you
    something, but they warrant a different kind of scrutiny than those
    at a governmental site. Pages found on educational or non-profit
    organization Web servers can be extraordinarily diverse. Non-profits
    can be professional associations or seditious societies or silly
    groups. Educational Web sites range from forums for sophomoric humor
    to clearinghouses for cutting edge articles on post-partum particle
    physics (OK, I made that last one up. Who can you trust? And who is
    the author of this page, anyway?).



  4. Know what's happening.

    Identify the purpose of the Web Page.
    Is the main purpose to inform, to persuade, or to sell you
    something? If you know the motive behind the page's creation, you
    can better judge its content.

    For example, an online movie
    review should be judged on the same merit as a review in the daily
    newspaper.

    Make sure what you are looking at is:


However, what you will more likely to find on the Web is


  1. Look at details.

    Although great ideas and great Web design are
    not necessarily linked, internal clues can tell you much about a Web
    page. Check for the obvious things, such as good grammar and correct
    spelling. Note the depth of the material presented. When was the Web
    item last revised, and how up-to-date are the links? What kind of
    sources are linked? Are the links evaluated or annotated in any way?
    Graphics may be great, but do they serve any purpose other than
    decoration? Just as a magazine with many color advertisements may
    have a different purpose than a scholarly journal with no
    illustrations, a Web site with mirthful color and slickness may not
    be primarily a research site.




Homework

Media Assignment


Using the topic of Water Conservation or Canadian Confederation take some time to
analyze the three links.

Evaluate three sites, write point form notes to answer each of the following questions.


  • Does this site address the specific topic?



  • What is the purpose of the site? Who is responsible for the site?



  • Does it tell you anything more than you could find out in an encyclopaedia?



  • Is the source of the site authoritative, or is the site of dubious value for research
    purposes?



  • Which of the sites are the "best" sites? Why? Why? Why?

Writing Assignment:
Write a persuasive paragraph(s) that gives your opinion about which site you think is
the best of the three you looked at and explain why.

Use the five questions to consider above as the starting point as proof for your argument for one particular site.

Remember one idea or thought is in one
paragraph.If you change your thought, you must start a new paragraph.
This is called cohesion.


Use the sheet for your rough notes.


Write a rough copy paragraph. Edit your work with a classmate. Then write a
good copy paragraph. Hand in.


Use the following structure:


Topic
sentence (answer which site you think is best)


Detail sentences (give reasons with evidence/proof to support your
opinion/argument)


Conclusion
sentence (finish your paragraph / close your thought)


Use and include the proper citing of a web page with your paragraph(s).

WORLD WIDE WEB Structure: Author or originator. Title of item. [Online] Date of document or download (day, month, year). URL .

Example: Classroom Connection. "How to cite resources." [Online] 11 September, 2008. http://www.classroom.com/community/connection/howto/citeresources.jhtml



No comments: